68 items, ordered by date. Displaying page 2 of 3. Show on timeline Items per page: 25 | 50 | All
AC Hugh Smith agreed to co-opting Sir Christopher Hogg on to the Committee. Also includes handwritten notes in preparation for or taken at the meeting with Chris Hogg.
Submission covers the role and responsibilities of boards of directors, financial reporting, shareholders, auditing and regulation.
28. Correspondence and submission for the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust, November 1991.
Submission to the Committee about shareholder relations, especially from viewpoint of institutional shareholder. Includes a handwritten note from Nigel peace wondering about asking Andrew Hugh Smoth for clarification.
29. Correspondence with and submission from Institute of Public Relations, December 1991
Main content is 'A submission to the Committee on the Finacinal Aspects of Corporate Governance by the Institute of Public Relations , City & Financial Group, December 1991.
Covers issues such as communication between boards and shareholders, emphasis on the long term, corporate reporting, company-auditor relationships, responsibilities of non-executive directors, audit committees and auditors responsibilities.
31. Correspondence, dated December 1991, between Terry Arthur and the Committee.
Article concerns the role of the institutional investor.
32. Letter, dated 16 December 1991, from Brian Houlden, Warwick Busines School
Letter concentrates on the role and behaviour of institutional shareholders, summarises UK investment in R& D, capital investment and takeovers with the funds now coming from the banks.
33. Letter, dated 19 December 1991, from Dr Maurice Gillibrand
Short letter saying he will make a submission based on experience at ICI and Chloride.
34. Corporate Governance Committee Correspondence 1992-1994.
Correspondence on subjects such as rights of executive directors to seek external professional advice and be re-imbursed, comments on comments on the draft report, the interests of of the 'private' shareholder as well as the interests of the institutional ones.
Davies, Arnold, Cooper proposes insurance for non-executive directors. Transparency International asks for support for its cause. Wilton proposes greater involvement of institutional shareholders.
36. Letter from Dermot de Trafford, Institute of Directors, 7 January 1992.
Expresses concerns about the misuse of information.
37. Record of meeting with Hugh Collum, 100 Group, 14 January 1992
Comments on the papers circulated for the 20-21 January 1992 meeting.
Covers some aspects of institutional investors and also their relations with non-executive directors in two articles.
39. A paper, dated 12 March 1992, giving CBI preliminary evidence to the Committee.
The paper covers the role and duties of directors, the responsibilities of institutional shareholders, auditors responsibilities and liabilities, accounting standards and pension fund management issues.
The views cover the range of auditing issues, non-executive directors, responsibilities of directors, divided boards and other matters.
41. Correspondence, dated 10 April 1992, from JE Rogers, the National Association of Pension Funds.
Correspondence concerns increased voting by institutional shareholders with samples from Royal Insurance, General Accident and Lloyds Bank.
Comments on potential for statements of conformity to become meaningless, possible progress to an international accounting regime and institutional shareholders, plus detailed comments.
Reports the results of a survey. Auditors are least likely to benefit while non-executive directors benefit most. Responsibility for compliance lies with company management and institutional shareholders or Stock Exchange, while expresses doubts over self-regulation.
44. Letter, dated 8 June 1992, from DJ Hughes with acknowledgement by Nigel Peace.
Comments that serious problems shareholders face, on remuneration committees and the Caparo case. Includes memo from Nigel Peace.
45. Letter, dated 18 June 1992, Annual Report analysis from Jonathan Chaytor and FT article.
Comments on institutional investors, non-executive directors and internal auditors.
This is a workshop exercise on the role of the directors in Eurotunnel delivered at the ICAEW conference . It is used to comment on unitary boards, separation of roles of Chairman and Chief Executive, non-executive directors and institutional investors.
47. Letter and comments, dated 30 June 1992, from Tim Knowles.
Comments on non-executive directors, financial reporting, auditing and institutional shareholders.
48. Handwritten letter, 10 July 1992, from WH Melly.
Comments on employee shareholders, directors pay-offs and pension funds.
49. Letter, 11 July 1992, from Ian J Mitchell.
Comments on information for the small shareholder, going concern and extended comments on take-overs and fraud.
50. Letter, 13 July 1992, from Sir George Russell, Marley plc.
Comments on differentiation between executive and non-executive directors, access to independent advice, and communication with shareholders.